in time is currently on the article " Loughner descent in the delusion "appeared. The author sums up his view: " who goes through the long list - in America and Germany, Finland, Great Britain and Japan - met always the same pattern. The crime was not political Climate, ideology, or the violent videos owed, but the disturbed psyche and otherworldly existence of the offender. "(Classic is in the article that the author does not ask how mental disorders arise because actually. But the only way.)
I give to the principle law. Usually applies: Without psychopathology not murder, and certainly not a massacre. The latter was the final act, as it is directed indiscriminately against men, after the Democratic deputy was hit. I do not think that you can have leading figures such as Sarah Palin primarily for the act with the responsibility. Shot, of course, only the perpetrators. Nevertheless, one must also continue go deeper and ask questions there may be. Even a "climate of hate" was not in the U.S. I think ultimately created by individuals. The roots of hatred are deep in American society. Political (emotional) delegates are able to hate - the "hidden order" of the people - by talking to flush something more to the surface. The main problem is not these few heads, but the many "ordinary" citizens and their disturbed emotions. (See also: ".! Children childhood in the USA God save America's ") Only this Thank explain why the (media) hatred so openly in the American Public can be held. This general and deep-rooted hatred distracted again - unless it is clearly in the media and the public will be listed - severely disturbed psychopaths and induced the same case to attacks. This connection should not hide it, even if Loughner is a case for psychiatry or better a case for a (therapeutic treatment) in prison.
presents for me this case is again a difficult question: How do the "open emotionally disturbed" by the "hidden emotionally disturbed"? Or better: How the company expects to open the insane how covered with the madman? Warum haben wir kein Problem damit, Einzeltäter, die einfache Menschen sind, als psychisch gestört anzusehen, während wir ganze Gruppen oder Gesellschaften oder Eliten, die destruktiv handeln, nicht als gestört ansehen?
Im Grundlagentext zitierte ich deMause. DeMause spricht in Folge kindlicher Gewalterfahrungen von abgespaltenen „Alter Egos“ (mehrere andere Ichs), diese sind letztlich wie (explosive) Koffer, in die die Menschen ihre traumatischen, abgespaltenen und urerträglichen Ängste und ihren Ärger packen. Diese Textstelle fällt mir hier wieder ein: „ Mit Ausnahme einiger Psychopathen und Psychotiker bewahren die meisten von uns ihre Koffer im Schrank hinter closed door, seemingly beyond our everyday life - but then we give the keys to emotional delegates, of whom we depend to act out the content and can make it possible for us to deny the ownership of the actions. "DeMause this refers primarily to the creation of wars.
brings the image of the case it probably to the point. Maybe you could knit the picture here a bit further. Loughner people like packing their bags off, while they do not pay out, however, what the values and norms of society in terms of "the Kofferauspacken. Therefore, they are locked away and as mentally Patient treated. Other press their case, lock it in the closet. This may then possibly be very self-reliant or have other reasons. But actually I think that the case be sealed never really (as long as they have not been defused therapeutic) and always mixed destructiveness in the normal everyday life.
much more important is that there are many people who unpack their bags too, just like Loughner. You do this just before clever, adapt to the values and norms, and know how to adjust well. For example, simply by being a soldier and legally exercise violence. Since people can then eg than 80 people killed und keiner würde einen später wegsperren oder als psychisch krank ansehen, sondern eher als „Opfer“ der Umstände Krieg. Wobei der Fall nicht so einfach ist, denn Loughner wollte ja Soldat werden und wäre heute wahrscheinlich in Afghanistan oder im Irak. Vielleicht wäre er sogar ein besonders guter Soldat geworden. Dass er polizeilich registriert war, brachte ihm eine Ablehnung beim Militär ein. Er wollte also ursprünglich die Spielregeln der legalen Gewalt akzeptieren. Nun steht er als psychisch Kranker da, da er die Regeln gebrochen hat.
Andere handeln destruktiv in der Wirtschaft, unterstützen dabei Prozesse, die etlichen Menschen das Leben kosten (manchmal mehr, als durch Krieg). Das sind dann rationale "Mistakes", etc. etc. I think you understand what I am here goes.
comes to this, the power factor is a good shield. Someone who is well respected and / or has a lot of power that can ever unpack his bags, to stand without being locked up. George W. Bush is perhaps a classic example. As democratically elected U.S. president, you might be a prime example of how one can kill thousands of people, without ever being punished or locked up as mentally ill.
Many companies are mentally ill. The U.S. company, in my feeling a lot more than the German, Afghan considerably more than the U.S. so healing can only begin but really, if the company admits to her illness at all. Otherwise, the path is a slow, in that the children are steadily improving education and making adult psychotherapy. Yes, a difficult topic.
Finally, a quote from above TIME article: " Then a furious argument with his father, after the storming of the son away. The rest is history, that America is torturing a long time. "About Loughner I had already written a review . It fits into the picture and has a significant symbolism that began immediately after a big argument with his father's killing spree. "A about them is not written by political forecasters, but by psychiatrists and investigative reporters carefully. The "climate of hate" is a different story, so real it is. , "writes the author of TIME in the next sentence. Ultimately it is the family climate of hate that should interest us regarding Loughner and DurschnittsamerikanerInnen and indeed the same story too.
0 comments:
Post a Comment