The following lines reflect only my thoughts, feelings and opinion about the last night relived Unit. They are regarded not as a ranking or even criticism as such, because I deserve criticism in any way.
Everyone has not only his own ideas and views of life, or in this case of art and culture, he should also be able to represent such and may not. If a poem or a picture of an artist I do not like to say the same is not the reason or the other must be bad, or any other person I think should be mandatory.
I therefore urge everyone who makes the effort here to finish reading to form your own opinions. Even more so I would be happy if appropriate diversity of opinion could be expressed and would here. Especially since I have indeed raised some points, but particularly in the area of children and youth are still many outstanding issues and problematic.
Thank you for your understanding.
robe
It is, in my view, a kind of culture, not to dispense with the trips to a toilet bag. All right. Some say wash bag, women like "the most necessary" to do so. At least it is an art to pack a suitcase properly.
But that was not really last night at the presentation. But
"Lets give themselves art?".
sound very interesting and perhaps informative. Especially since this issue right away so can not be answered with a yes, so. In any case, we were curious, so the house boss and me. And probably all of us went with two other expectations to this event. She had, however, to be completed by both of us the heavier part. After all, they should write an article for the daily paper about Thun. Whereas I read not only my imagination run wild, but he had some questions on the subject. Unfortunately the time was so closely sized to the box alone for my questions had not been sufficient. And so I listened to the Referrenten, which, incidentally, was an art critic, body and soul to his own testimony once.
War, "in this case, a 40-year-old, exciting and varied career, which it from teachers to the museum director, by author, to cultural critics brought back bad. The right Reihnfolge I now no longer remember correctly. The age dependent.
such thing, of course, leaves traces. Less of the phenomenon itself, as much more of the way of the Unit. :"...
According to Wikipedia on Unit presented the case of a unit it is primarily the reproduction of known facts and ideas ...". Means above all its own.
For my taste, was the first and larger Veranstaltungsälfte by appropriate self-expression and personal development traits "überreferiert. But sometimes the views are always looked so Betracter relative. However, he answered me thus at the very beginning an important question.
"Are artists Narzzisten special"?
Apparently so. Specifically when it was in his way was, and is also an artist, but a certain self-love is indeed in the end in all of us. As long as this self-love is healthy, it does not like a permanent risk to the environment dar. I'm coming from the subject slightly. Back to contents last night.
Much has been said, shown, and of course Vorrausgesetzt oracle. This with the premise that concerned the factual and artistic part of the event was for me as uninitiated, however, quickly and easily explained. Not only because the house and I head for optical criteria here, the youngest participants were obviously, but here had to be a kind of encounter of a close and closer Höhrerkreises is known, which at regular intervals and appropriate tiefschlürfende evenings keeps. And some of it had either abandoned their age to conceal, or simply no longer necessary. On "youth rate". Thank you.
However, I found the courage amazing what he did in-depth and partial resignation statements. Probably more than just the life experience behind it. Whether that voice, however, by the competent und verantwortlichen Kulturobleuten gehört und verstanden wird, ist die zweite Frage. Vorbehaltlos kann, nein muss ich mich seiner Ansicht anschliessen, dass die heutige Kunst ein Mittel zum Zweck geworden ist. Sie befindet sich zum Teil Lichtjahre vom kulturellem Ursprung entfernt und wird immer mehr zum Konsumprodukt unserer Zeit degradiert. Immer mehr wird Kultur als Anlagartikelt und weniger zum Genussobjekt erklärt und erhoben. Entsprechende Beispiele führte er nicht nur bildlich auf, sondern beweisen auch die emensen Unsummen, welche private Anleger bei "Kunstauktionen" aufbringen. Viele künstlerische und sinnreiche Objekte verschwinden dadurch in diversen Bankschliessfächern, gehen wahrscheinlich für die Allgemeinheit verloren.
Die andere Seite war das Einbringen der Kinder und Jugendlichen in die Welt der Kunst. Das Verständnis und die entsprechende Förderung. Wobei die Frage sich aufwirft, ist Kunst erlernbar? Und wenn ja wie. Die heutigen Kunstschulen und da musste ich ihm auch wieder Recht geben, produzieren immer mehr Masse, statt Klasse. Und nur wer eine entsprechende Ausbildung nachweisen kann, hat vielleicht "berechtigte" und wohlwollende berufliche Karrierechancen. Alles andere fällt dadurch automatisch unter die Ruprik, "Basteln" und "Freizeitleinendarstellung". Ist das der richtige und anstrebenswerte Weg?
Was ist eigentlich Kultur, von der wir heute im allgemeinem reden? Ist sich benehmen können nicht auch a kind of culture? is an appropriate and creative food Seger Maybe not conjure up an art? Who sets really well set on what art really is? If it does not end the "culture and art consumers' itself, as we? A fully emptied garbage bag in the middle of a museum hall is now dads art, or stupidity? Who requires us to find a picture of beautiful or not? Is not this again at the end only one type of constraint which we submit ourselves out of convenience? Is it not better to let your own imagination to decide for themselves can and can what is beautiful and what is not?
So you see that it is precisely in this respect certainly give more questions would help. But part of it was so declared at the end. All ring back from the perspective of a second person. These are questions that may raise new. But an appropriate response can not and should not expect much less from other art critics. The answers must be answered himself. Even if it takes and maybe a lack of relevant experience at the moment. I think the way I look at a picture, a book like to read, or even look at me like a movie, so "me" is not something like. Taste and Opinions diverge. And that's good. The questions I had, should also apply at the end so only as a basis for discussion in general. The answers however, only stimulate reflection and are taught not as a "lesson" of its own conception of life. However, an appropriate and stimulating discussion had been made as a high point in expectation. This was not only due to the above already named "Introduction to self-representation" is too short, but also the type of Farge and answer game. If a Refernt little bit nervous at the clock looking to stifle emerging issues or talks if the audience already in Keinm, this was for me a satisfying artistic experience.
As such, I was disappointed a little light, I had expected more. But on the other hand, some points which have been "addressed", It is worth thinking about. So bottom line but a successful, especially cultural evening?
robe
0 comments:
Post a Comment