" Gaddafi screaming down his people," writes SPIEGEL about the current television speech by the dictator. " While the country is sinking into chaos, the Air Force to shoot demonstrators and should be several cities in the country already in the hands of the opposition, projecting itself Gaddafi like a mix of eccentric and realitätsfernem furious father, the children run away . Emotional, endless and at times confused speeches are the Libyans from their dictator used to -. But this performance was falling at this time a declaration of war against its own people "
me again and again that leaders of authoritarian states or dictators - but also other political leader - a family role play, usually that of a father who watches over his people, all white, is all powerful and imposing penalties if necessary, if there is misconduct in his house. Also, there are examples of how seeds were divided by marital roles (eg the "great Brother of Russia "and the attached states of USSR or the former Yugoslavia, where, according Alenka Puhar the" resist was family zadruga system "of the region in the States there layout and in the appropriate behavior.) Gaddafi's recent speech on state television came I also like that of a furious, authoritarian father before, the danger of losing control of the children. Gaddafi himself had in the past like to address you as "Brother Gaddafi," "brother leader", "Brother Colonel" or "Brother Guide of the Revolution." Here, too, finds himself the connection to the family in language and gesture. Ein Anführer des „Clan der Warfala“ (mit rund einer Million Angehörigen) hat jetzt gesagt, Gaddafi sei kein Bruder mehr. Die „Familienbande“ wurde aufgelöst, so scheint es. Gaddafi wird nicht länger als oberstes „Familienoberhaupt“ akzeptiert, sondern bekämpft.
Wie konnte es überhaupt dazu kommen, dass ein offensichtlich Wahnsinniger 40 Jahre lang ein Volk regieren und unterdrücken konnte? Ich bin der festen Überzeugung, dass „Familienmitglieder“, die in der Kindheit Respekt, Geborgenheit und Liebe erfahren durften, nicht plötzlich einen „neuen Vater“ oder „Bruder“ akzeptieren würden, der brutal und autoritär going on. Just because they knew it different, because their thoughts and feelings of freedom, trust, respect and security at home was struck. Then, when someone like Gaddafi and would like to take power, they would throw him relatively quickly from their "family". If, however, was characterized their childhood from the start by violence and humiliation, then a "father" or "brother" Gaddafi is just something one is accustomed to things not questioned, the one to bend and his instructions are followed, etc. .
In the Islamic world violence against children in many ways is widespread. This family violence is the foundation of injustice States and destructive leaders. If the people are to a large extent of beloved children, dictators have no chance. However, it would be interesting
investigate to what extent has possibly evolved and improved over the last three decades is the parenting practices in the region. If there could find a continuous improvement, this might be a possible explanation for the present turmoil. How Slovenia - which had developed with respect to the child-rearing practice much better than the other Balkan states - in the early 80s, more and more like a "liberated Adolescents" (see Alenka Puhar) and began to act against the authoritarian "brother Serbia rebelled, could be also in the Islamic world, a similar process. However, not between states but within nations. Whether the States there will automatically become an "adult" democracy remains to be seen. Similar armed conflicts, as in former Yugoslavia we are spared hopefully.
0 comments:
Post a Comment